28 March 2011

Alibi [Nominee ~ 1929]


"Well you would think so, Tommy.  I beat you to it."



First off, this is a very trippy movie poster for 1929.  The colors, the typography, the floating heads...   I kind of like it.  Which also pretty much sums up my thoughts about this movie in general.

Alibi is the story of mobster Chick Williams, who finds himself wanted for the murder of a police officer.  His alibi almost checks out, but detectives are eager to poke holes in his story.  Things are further complicated when Williams marries Joan, a police officer's daughter who has also caught the eye of an overzealous detective.

What I found most interesting about this film is how it completely blurs the line between hero and villain.  The mobsters are initially portrayed in a sympathetic light (Williams' is released from prison in the beginning, and insists he was framed by crooked cops), and the policemen stoop to objectionable and often brutal methods on the job (a cop threatens to murder a man if he doesn't identify Williams as the murderer).  This questioning of right and wrong perfectly reflects the atmosphere of the 1920s.  Prohibition was probably the most flouted law in American history.  Political corruption was rampant in many large cities.  Al Capone, though clearly a criminal, was viewed as a modern-day Robin Hood for funneling his ill-gotten gains into charity work.  Alibi shines a light on these issues, which have never completely left the American landscape.

What I didn't care for was the story's pacing.  The film clocks in at just under 1 hour 30 minutes, yet somehow drags.  The most exciting scenes last a few minutes, while boring bits are allowed to carry on for far too long.  (There is one death scene in particular that is ridiculously long and over the top.  I hope that even the 1929 audience cringed a little while watching this.)  The short runtime also means there is little character development.  Joan particularly suffers from this.  She is introduced as a naive girl, and never amounts to anything more.  It was also frustrating to receive almost no back story on her and Chick's romance.  How did they meet?  What drew her to him?  Why would she wait for him while he was in prison?  These are details that could have fleshed out her character, and developed further audience sympathy for Chick.

Alibi also offers some nice visuals.  The opening scenes use highly stylized sets that feel very ahead of their time.  I also enjoyed a nearly silent montage where two detectives test Chick Williams' alibi.  Scenes like this really highlight the transition that was being made from silent films to "talkies."  Directors were experimenting with new storytelling techniques, but often still relied on old standbys to pass information to the audience.  Finally, a couple performance numbers are thrown in to showcase the use of sound, but what I really enjoyed were the hideously unflattering costumes and Rockettes-style dance numbers.

All things considered, Alibi is a pretty good film.  I rather liked it, and feel it probably should have won the Best Picture Oscar over The Broadway Melody that year.  It's certainly a more engaging story, and dealt with serious issues of the day.  Definitely worth watching, though I will warn you that the audio quality on the DVD is terrible.  (The dialogue is often too low to hear, and gets drowned out by crackling static in the films soundtrack.)

14 March 2011

The Broadway Melody [Winner ~ 1929]



"They were plenty smart when they made you beautiful."

1929 is shaping up to be a pretty terrible year.  So far the nominees list includes a movie you can't watch, a movie with no plot, and The Broadway Melody.*


I felt like I was missing something the entire time I watched this movie.  I could see it being a box office success (it was the highest grossing film of 1929), but a Best Picture winner?  Surely I was missing something huge.


Or not.  According to filmsite.org, 1929 was not a banner year for the Oscars.  The winners were all closely associated with the Academy's Board, making the awards questionable at the very least.  Then there was the not-so-small matter of "talkies" being made eligible for the first time.  To quote filmsite: "The films nominated for this year's awards were some of the weakest films in the history of American cinema, reflecting the chaos of the transition from silents to sound films."  So my best guess is that the Academy wanted to honor it's own and promote what it viewed as the future of film, even if the overall quality wasn't up to snuff.


Melody's story is a cliche backstage look at performers.  Two sisters, "Hank" and Queenie, move to New York to follow their dreams of being Broadway stars.  A love triangle develops between the siblings and friend Eddie Kerns.  Kerns gets the sisters into a Francis Zanfield show, where Queenie catches the eye of Jock Warriner, a well-to-do society type.  This film includes many staples of the "behind the scenes" genre, including: a spoiled actor, under appreciated stagehands and musicians, a gay costume designer, and jealous chorus girls starting a cat fight.  I can't help but thinking that even in 1929 these stereotypes were less than fresh.


That being said, I don't think The Broadway Melody is a waste of time.  As someone who loves musicals it was fun to see one of the first.  The big production numbers are lively, and some of the songs are cute.  Also, anyone looking to spice up their wedding ceremony should check out "The Wedding of the Painted Doll" sequence, because let's face it, everyone has already seen that Chris Brown wedding entrance. (But it's still fun to watch.)





*Plus there was all that Depression business right around the corner, but this isn't Planet Money and I haven't watched The Grapes of Wrath yet, so let's just save that discussion until later.

07 March 2011

The Hollywood Revue of 1929 [Nominee ~ 1929]




For this "project" I decided on one major rule: Don't read the plot synopsis before watching the movie.  While I almost always know the general plot of today's movies before seeing them, I thought it would be fun to go into these movies blind.  Easy enough, given that I'm not constantly bombarded with trailers, commercials, and Hollywood news for 80+ year old films.  I really only need to avoid the Netflix sleeve.

Unfortunately, I've already begun to cheat.  I've started reading plot synopses of films I haven't gotten or can't get a copy of.  It's pure curiosity-- I just have to know what I'm missing.

My curiosity for The Hollywood Revue of 1929 was mostly sparked by an early search for the film.  While I have yet to locate a copy, I did find several clips on YouTube.  After watching a few I quickly deduced the plot of this movie: there is no plot.  Further reading on IMDB and Wikipedia confirmed my suspicions.  This is essentially a feature-length showcase of MGM's biggest stars.  (Perhaps the word "revue" should have tipped me off to this sooner?)

Even though this doesn't really seem like a Best Picture nominee to me right now, I will reserve judgement until I see the entire movie.  From what I have seen, it at least looks fun.  Buster Keaton doing 'The Dance of the Sea' was a neat look at a star I previously only knew by name, as was Laurel and Hardy's magic act.  And I'd also be remiss not to mention Joan Crawford's 'Got a Feeling for You.' I really enjoyed her singing and dancing routine.  Too bad I couldn't stop thinking "That's 'Mommie Dearest?'" during the entire clip.